[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt
|
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
|
Subject: |
Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt |
|
Date: |
Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:47:34 +0200 |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> ha escrit:
> You may want to file this as a bug against glibc, since gnulib's argp is
> inherited from upstream.
That is not quite so. Gnulib's argp, while being backward compatible
with its glibc ancestor, does differ from it in some regards.
Regards,
Sergey
- argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Ben Asselstine, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Eric Blake, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/11/06
Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/11/06