[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt
|
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
|
Subject: |
Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt |
|
Date: |
Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:07:23 +0200 |
Alfred M. Szmidt <address@hidden> ha escrit:
> This duplicates work, and makes things incompatible (gnulib's argp
> might get features that glibc argp does not have). Is there anyone
> who could see that gnulib's argp is merged with glibc?
I tried, but so far to no avail.
Regards,
Sergey
- argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Ben Asselstine, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Eric Blake, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/11/06
Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/11/06