Re: copyright question on recent autoupdate

[Karl Berry]

    I just noticed that with the recent autoupdate, config.sub now has a
    copyright of 2010 but a timestamp of 2009-12-30 two lines later.  It
    looks rather awkward.  Is there any legal issue with listing a
    copyright year too soon?

It seems suboptimal, but I can't imagine that it's a substantive
problem.  And since the issue is going to disappear with the next
config.* update, I vote we ignore it.  If you like, you could ask Ben to
push out another change just to get the years in sync :).