[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: exitfail
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: exitfail |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:55:49 +0100 |
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> There is also this warning:
>
> gnulib-tool: warning: module obstack depends on a module with an incompatible
> license: exitfail
>
> The exitfail.h is:
>
> extern int volatile exit_failure;
>
> and exitfail.c is:
>
> #include <config.h>
> #include "exitfail.h"
> #include <stdlib.h>
> int volatile exit_failure = EXIT_FAILURE;
>
> Is this worth having the GPL on? Assuming it is even copyrightable, it
> seems rather trivial to me. Any objections to relaxing the license to
> at least LGPLv2.1+?
I suppose you intend "LGPLv2+" here, so it's like all of the others,
and not LGPLv2.1+. Likewise in the patch below.
> Further, exitfail.m4 is:
>
> AC_DEFUN([gl_EXITFAIL],
> [
> AC_LIBOBJ([exitfail])
>
> dnl No prerequisites of lib/exitfail.c.
> :
> ])
>
> It seems this file could be dropped, and the AC_LIBOBJ moved to
> modules/exitfail.
I agree.
> Subject: [PATCH] exitfail: Relax license to LGPLv2.1+. Drop exitfail.m4.
...
s/2.1/2/ in the log
> Makefile.am:
>
> @@ -18,7 +17,7 @@ Include:
> "exitfail.h"
>
> License:
> -GPL
> +LGPLv2.1+
And here.
I'll see if Paul agrees.
- exitfail, Simon Josefsson, 2010/03/04
- Re: exitfail,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: exitfail, Simon Josefsson, 2010/03/04
- relax licenses for both exitfail and exit, Jim Meyering, 2010/03/05
- Re: relax licenses for both exitfail and exit, Simon Josefsson, 2010/03/05
- Re: relax licenses for both exitfail and exit, Jim Meyering, 2010/03/06
- Re: euidaccess, Bruno Haible, 2010/03/06
- Re: euidaccess, Jim Meyering, 2010/03/06
- Re: euidaccess, Bruno Haible, 2010/03/06
- Re: euidaccess, Jim Meyering, 2010/03/06
- Re: euidaccess, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/03/07
- Re: euidaccess, Simon Josefsson, 2010/03/06