Re: replacement header licenses

[Simon Josefsson]

Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:

> The following replacement headers are all under LGPL instead of LGPLv2+
> licensing.  Any objection to relaxing them, so that projects like
> libvirt can use all the replacement headers for things like
> GNULIB_POSIXCHECK or passing Jim's recent maint.mk syntax check?
>
> fcntl-h
> getopt-posix
> inttypes
> locale
> math
> pty
> sched
> search
> spawn
> stdarg
> sysexits
>
> For the record, I'm okay with my contributions being relaxed (fcntl-h,
> getopt-posix, math).

I'm okay with pty and sysexits and my contributions for any other
module.

Have you checked that the modules above doesn't depend on anything that
isn't also LGPLv2+ or more permissive?  That's important or we'll get
internal license conflicts.

/Simon