bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: license alteration for chown/lchown


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: license alteration for chown/lchown
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:32:01 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100805 Red Hat/3.1.2-2.el6 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.2

On 07/29/2010 02:35 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Adam Stokes wrote:
>> Is it possible to change these modules licenses to LGPLv2+?
> 
> Have you considered releasing your library under LGPLv3+?
> 
> For your request, the following contributors since 2007-10-07
> would have to agree:
> 
>     Module          Source file             Contributors
>     ------          -----------             ------------
> 
>     chown           lib/chown.c             Eric Blake
> 
>     lchown          lib/lchown.c            Eric Blake
> 
>     open            lib/open.c              Eric Blake, Bruno Haible

How did you come up with this list?  Or more generally, what's the
easiest way to check whether a list of modules meets a certain license
restriction?  I know that --lgpl=2 works when using --import into an
existing project, but it didn't seem to do a thing when I tried:

$ ./gnulib-tool --with-tests --create-testdir --dir=testdir1 --lgpl=2 lchown

I was expecting that to abort with a complaint about incompatible modules.

I also tried:

$ ./gnulib-tool --extract-license `./gnulib-tool --extract-dependencies
lchown chown open`

but that doesn't tell which modules have the problems, just whether
there are any that aren't LGPLv2+.

-- 
Eric Blake   address@hidden    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]