Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer

[Reuben Thomas]

On 14 August 2010 19:48, Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
> Reuben Thomas wrote:
>> In the end I found very little to change on a first look. The attached patch:
>>
>> 1. Removes mentions of regex.c.
>
> I've committed this part for you.
>
>> 2. Adds documentation of not_eol.
>
> I haven't committed this part, because you added a paragraph about not_eol
> in the section Match-beginning-of-line Operator, where in my opinion it
> belongs in section Match-end-of-line Operator.

Sorry, I have moved it to the correct section (my lack of care). New
patch attached.

-- 
http://rrt.sc3d.org

0001-Document-not_eol.patch
Description: Text Data