[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Documentation question
From: |
Reuben Thomas |
Subject: |
Re: Documentation question |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:03:40 +0100 |
On 14 August 2010 23:09, Karl Berry <address@hidden> wrote:
> [reducing to bug-gnulib]
>
> unhappy with code-generated documentation.
>
> We can have code-generated documentation *if* you (or someone) writes
> rms with a detailed explanation of the situation (I can review any
> draft). He always (to my knowledge) has had various
> requests/recommendations for how to proceed. So it's not forbidden, but
> the details of every situation seem to be different, and my guesses
> about how to handle them have sometimes been wrong, so I can't be the
> advisor :).
Unsurprisingly, the work on regex.texi is turning out to be rather
more time-consuming than I first hoped, so I may well end up passing
on this other bit altogether. IOW, don't expect anything more from me
on this unless I explicitly say I'm going to work on it.
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org