[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: git log -> changelog
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: git log -> changelog |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:44:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-04-22) |
Hello,
* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:23:57PM CEST:
> The git pages are clear that S-O-B has project-dependent
> interpretation. Coreutils currently doesn't even use it (the only
> people with commit privileges to the master coreutils.git have FSF
> copyright, and it is assumed that they are each trustworthy enough
> to do due diligence in verifying that patches from other
> contributors meet copyright rules, without relying on any markup in
> the commit message itself).
>
> But if we wanted, we could adopt a policy that S-O-B on GNU projects
> using the gitlog-to-changelog conversion implies (partial)
> authorship, above and beyond the --author.
Except that the autotools project logs contain lots of S-O-B entries
which explicitly do not have that particular meaning. :-/
Cheers,
Ralf