Re: OpenBSD 4.7 vs nanosleep

[Jim Meyering]

Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,

Hi Bruno,

>> This isn't a show-stopper for the coreutils release.
>
> But it's easy to fix. The bug is actually in the gnulib replacement, which
> is missing a check on the validity of the argument.
>
>
> 2010-10-08  Bruno Haible  <address@hidden>
>
>       nanosleep: Make replacement POSIX compliant.
>       * lib/nanosleep.c (nanosleep): Return -1/EINVAL if the delay's tv_nsec
>       is out of range.
>       Reported by Jim Meyering.

I should have looked a little bit further ;-)
Thanks for the quick patch.