[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libposix - is it done yet?
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: libposix - is it done yet? |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:04:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
* Bruce Korb wrote on Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 02:59:04AM CEST:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > Bruce Korb wrote:
> >> Having looked
> >> through the module sources, there is no clear way of
> >> deriving the list of header macro names.
>
> > So you can recognize it through BUILT_SOURCES.
> >
> > $ for module in `./posix-modules`; do grep '^BUILT_SOURCES += \$(.*_H)$'
> > modules/$module; done
>
> Just to be completely clear, the BUILT_SOURCES in Makefile.am is now
> overloaded. Not only does it mean (to automake anyway) that the
> source gets built first, but also that it defines a header that is to
> be installed for libposix.
You could easily fix that by having a variable posix_headers, adding
headers there, and letting gnulib-tool add
BUILT_SOURCES += $(posix_headers)
to save you duplication.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: libposix - is it done yet?, (continued)
- Re: libposix - is it done yet?, Bruce Korb, 2010/10/10
- Re: libposix - is it done yet?, Bruno Haible, 2010/10/10
- Re: libposix - is it done yet?, Bruce Korb, 2010/10/10
- Re: libposix - is it done yet?, Bruno Haible, 2010/10/10
- Re: libposix - is it done yet?, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/10/10
- Re: libposix - is it done yet?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/10/11
- Re: libposix - is it done yet?, Bruce Korb, 2010/10/11
Re: libposix - is it done yet?, Bruce Korb, 2010/10/10
- Re: libposix - is it done yet?,
Ralf Wildenhues <=