bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: findutils on interix


From: Markus Duft
Subject: Re: findutils on interix
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 07:49:17 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100913 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.3

On 10/29/2010 01:11 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/28/2010 04:59 PM, Markus Duft wrote:
>> thinking of gnulib, i can see a lot of potential problems, starting fex, 
>> that gnulib
>> modules are copied into the packages, rather than gnulib beeing an installed 
>> library
>> that is linked against (is this true always?).
> 
> It is true that gnulib is usually copied into packages.  However, it is 
> possible to put multiple gnulib modules into a single statically linked 
> library.  This is what gentoo does with its ebuild; you can search recent 
> archives for "libposix", too (which is just a selection of gnulib modules 
> improving the POSIX-ness of a system).

mhm, so at least ATM, it's most of the time static. would it be much of a 
problem to
build things both shared and static? also, is there a chance i'm able to 
install libc.a
and libc.so in a way that i never destroy anything on any system? is it wanted 
for
gnulib at all to install such scripts?

> 
>> in gentoo prefix (gentoo main too? idk) there is a "gnulib" ebuild, which 
>> builds a
>> library of gnulib to fix some system deficiencies, but IIRC it's static 
>> only. i'd
>> rather like suacomp to be static wherever possible to ease bugfixing, 
>> upgrades, etc.
> 
> There's something inconsistent here. :)

hah, lol - of course, suacomp should be shared wherever possible ;)

> 
> Paolo
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]