[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] maint: new rule to update copyright year ranges
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/2] maint: new rule to update copyright year ranges |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Jan 2011 23:17:21 GMT |
Thanks. Those are probably worth excluding manually.
Let's hear what Karl has to say.
Excluding INSTALL* and install.texi from this process sounds good to me.
BTW, is there some reason why install.texi makes the nonstandard
formatting setting:
@firstparagraphindent insert
Personally, I think it would be better to take the default, just because
it's the default, though I can't say I'm too worked up about it.
And, does anyone mind if I remove the @acronym commands from
install.texi, per our too-long prior discussion?
k
- [PATCH 1/2] maint: new rule to update copyright year ranges, Jim Meyering, 2011/01/01
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] maint: new rule to update copyright year ranges, Bruno Haible, 2011/01/01
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] maint: new rule to update copyright year ranges, Jim Meyering, 2011/01/01
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] maint: new rule to update copyright year ranges,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] maint: new rule to update copyright year ranges, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/01/02
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] maint: new rule to update copyright year ranges, Karl Berry, 2011/01/02
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] maint: new rule to update copyright year ranges, Eric Blake, 2011/01/04
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] maint: new rule to update copyright year ranges, Karl Berry, 2011/01/04
- [PATCH] doc: regenerate INSTALL, Eric Blake, 2011/01/04