[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: uninorm/nfc - Unicode version?
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: uninorm/nfc - Unicode version? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:08:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Hi Simon,
> I recalled another concern: libunistring is LGPLv3+, glibc is LGPLv2+.
> I don't know how glibc people will think about dynamically loading
> LGPLv3+ code
Yes, good point.
> A daemon approach with a smaller wrapper library to communicate with it
> would avoid this concern too
I'm not in favour of implementing bloated or technically bad solutions for
the reasons of copyright...
> -- would you be willing to relicense libunistring (or parts
> of it, given that I'll probably stay at Unicode 5.2 at least until I've
> confirmed that it works fine with Unicode 6.0 too) in this case?
... therefore, yes, I'm willing to relicense the parts of libunistring that
libidna needs under LGPLv2+. Please come back to me again when you have the
complete and minimal list of the modules that you need.
Bruno
- Re: uninorm/nfc - Unicode version?, (continued)
- Re: uninorm/nfc - Unicode version?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/01/04
- Re: uninorm/nfc - Unicode version?, Bruno Haible, 2011/01/09
- Re: uninorm/nfc - Unicode version?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/01/09
- Re: Unicode version and libidna, Bruno Haible, 2011/01/09
- Re: Unicode version and libidna, Simon Josefsson, 2011/01/09
- Re: uninorm/nfc - Unicode version?, Ben Pfaff, 2011/01/09
- Re: uninorm/nfc - Unicode version?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/01/18
- Re: uninorm/nfc - Unicode version?,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: uninorm/nfc - Unicode version?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/01/19