bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sc_error_message_uppercase


From: Jim Meyering
Subject: Re: sc_error_message_uppercase
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:46:17 +0100

Eric Blake wrote:

> On 01/27/2011 08:16 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>>>>   @grep -nEA2 '[^rp]error *\(' $$($(VC_LIST_EXCEPT))              \
>>>
>>> Is there a way to tighten it, by passing the grep output through a sed
>>> script that combines multiple lines (easily determined by the difference
>>> between file: and file- for matching vs. context lines and the --
>>> separator between hunks), then limit the detection of the capital letter
>>> to one occurring after error( but before ';'?
>>
>> That sounds like it'd be an improvement.  With that, we could
>> search a couple more lines of following context, too.
>> While I haven't been willing to spend any more time on it,
>> you're welcome to do so.
>>
>> One tiny fly in the ointment: ';' inside a string or in a comment
>> between concatenated strings would cause trouble.
>
> Yes, it means possible false negatives, but that's probably not a
> practical concern.  Really, who writes code this awful, with a ; in a
> comment prior to the error message?
>
> error (0, errno, /* ; */ _("Oops"));

It doesn't have to be awful:

          error (0, errno, /* a few words; more words.  */
                 _("Oops"));

but, as I said, it's a tiny fly.

> Whereas a ';' inside a string is not too likely to cause issues; this
> (mis-)usage would still be caught:
>
> error (0, errno, "%s", _("Oops; you did something wrong"));
>
> because we are looking for any instance of "[A-Z] after the open ( but
> before the first ;, and a ; within the string is after the point we care
> about.

Good point.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]