[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rename, same-inode, unlink LGPL -> LGPLv2+?
|
From: |
Eric Blake |
|
Subject: |
Re: rename, same-inode, unlink LGPL -> LGPLv2+? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:04:51 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 01/28/2011 02:26 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Hi! I'm using rename/unlink (the former depends on same-inode) in a
> LGPLv2+ library and noticed they are marked as 'LGPL' in gnulib.
> According to comments in files or git logs you have written parts of
> these files. Would you consider relicensing these under the LGPLv2+?
> The files same-inode.h and unlink.c looks relatively trivial, although
> rename.c looks a bit more complicated.
Works for me.
--
Eric Blake address@hidden +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- rename, same-inode, unlink LGPL -> LGPLv2+?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/01/28
- Re: rename, same-inode, unlink LGPL -> LGPLv2+?, Jim Meyering, 2011/01/28
- Re: rename, same-inode, unlink LGPL -> LGPLv2+?, Bruno Haible, 2011/01/28
- Re: rename, same-inode, unlink LGPL -> LGPLv2+?,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: rename, same-inode, unlink LGPL -> LGPLv2+?, Ben Pfaff, 2011/01/28
- Re: rename, same-inode, unlink LGPL -> LGPLv2+?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/01/29