[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:06:13 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 01/31/11 15:55, Eric Blake wrote:
> Actually, you also need to be careful with the gnulib file
> tests/test-stdbool.h, which uses HAVE_STDBOOL_H as a pseudo-witness of
> whether _Bool is a compiler built-in type
Thanks for mentioning that.
How about if we fix that by having test-stdbool.h use HAVE__BOOL
(which it should be doing anyway, since that's what it really wants)
and by adding the following to modules/stdbool-tests,
under "Makefile.am:"?
test_stdbool_CFLAGS = -DHAVE_BOOL=$(HAVE_BOOL)
- HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/31
- Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H, Eric Blake, 2011/01/31
- Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H, Eric Blake, 2011/01/31
- Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: HAVE_STDBOOL_H, AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, and AM_STDBOOL_H, Russ Allbery, 2011/01/31