[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: passfd on more platforms
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: passfd on more platforms |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:29:49 +0100 |
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 17:10, Bastien ROUCARIES
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 03/14/2011 05:03 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>>>
>>> Not sure BTW it will be really simple:
>>> - send as oob data if fail with WSAEOPNOTSUPP come back to normal send
>>
>> But it will _always_ fail if people are using sendfd/recvfd as we (should)
>> document it, i.e. on SOCK_DGRAM sockets!
>
> Yes and if it fail we will fall back to the normal send, so no fail
So why try in the first place?!?
Paolo
- Re: passfd on more platforms, (continued)
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Eric Blake, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Bastien ROUCARIES, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Bastien ROUCARIES, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Bastien ROUCARIES, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Bastien ROUCARIES, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Bastien ROUCARIES, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Bastien ROUCARIES, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Eric Blake, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Bastien ROUCARIES, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/14