[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposed patch for bootstrap
From: |
Bruce Korb |
Subject: |
Re: proposed patch for bootstrap |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:19:54 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101206 SUSE/3.1.7 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 04/05/11 12:58, Eric Blake wrote:
On 04/05/2011 01:19 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
This fixes two things:
1. "gnulib_extra_files" should not be computed before sourcing the
bootstrap.conf file, unless you intend that overriding build_aux
forces overriding gnulib_extra_files, too. I don't think so, so
I deferred its computation until afterward.
2. I also ran into a problem with auto-sorting of an order-dependent
file. Below simply appends a file name if it is not found, leaving
the original order above the newly inserted entry. Changed the
function name, too.
These should be split into two separate commits, since they touch two
separate issues.
Yep. I think we're in less-than-vehement agreement here. :)
I think I'm okay with your resolution for the first issue. However,
your solution for the second issue conflicts with my proposed patch for:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/25869
What order-dependent sorting rules do you have, that would not already
be covered by sinking ! lines to the bottom of the .gitignore file per
the patch I just posted there?
The order-that-I-put-them-in rule. In general, I think I understand
stuff better than a computer, so why am I being over-ruled?
The hypothetical and still somewhat concrete issue is the sequence:
1. ignore this file pattern
2. but don't ignore this pattern ('!' prefix)
3. but do ignore this specific file
sinking to the bottom causes #2 to override #3, but I don't have that
problem. It is theoretical until someone stubs their toe.
For me, the difference is that when I want a particular order,
I don't think that tools should go in and correct me. :)
That said, I'll leave it your call and only make the first patch.
- proposed patch for bootstrap, Bruce Korb, 2011/04/05
- Re: proposed patch for bootstrap, Eric Blake, 2011/04/05
- Re: proposed patch for bootstrap,
Bruce Korb <=
- Re: proposed patch for bootstrap, Eric Blake, 2011/04/05
- Re: proposed patch for bootstrap, Bruce Korb, 2011/04/05
- Re: proposed patch for bootstrap, Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/04/06
- Re: proposed patch for bootstrap, Bruce Korb, 2011/04/06
- Re: proposed patch for bootstrap, Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/04/06
- Re: proposed patch for bootstrap, Bruce Korb, 2011/04/06
- Re: proposed patch for bootstrap, Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/04/07