[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC-tag again
From: |
Reuben Thomas |
Subject: |
Re: VC-tag again |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Apr 2011 21:39:30 +0100 |
On 30 April 2011 21:33, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
> Reuben Thomas wrote:
>> On 30 April 2011 11:54, Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> The secondary mechanism is that a package can have a README-release.diff
>>> file and use the --local-dir option.
>>
>> That seems like a nice way of editing in per-project sections, but
>> seems a bit over the top for just getting the name of the project in.
>>
>> Jim, if you're now expecting another version of the patch from me, I'm
>> now slightly unclear on which of the various above-discussed changes
>> and/or enhancements I should be making, so a summary'd be nice!
>
> Bruno's suggestion to use README-release.diff may be a good mechanism for
> a package to insert specialized sections into that more general template.
> However, there are enough uses of @PACKAGE@ that I think it would not be
> a good replacement for the simple one-liner to perform the substitution.
Yup, as I said.
> So I suggest to add a comment telling the reader to add that one-liner to
> autogen.sh or bootstrap.conf's epiloge function. You may also want to
> note that as with any gnulib-tool supplied file, it can be customized
> via a .diff file as Bruno mentioned.
Great, will modify patch for that.
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org
- Re: VC-tag again, (continued)
- Re: VC-tag again, Jim Meyering, 2011/04/29
- Re: VC-tag again, Reuben Thomas, 2011/04/29
- Re: VC-tag again, Jim Meyering, 2011/04/29
- Re: VC-tag again, Reuben Thomas, 2011/04/29
- Re: VC-tag again, Reuben Thomas, 2011/04/29
- Re: VC-tag again, Jim Meyering, 2011/04/30
- Re: VC-tag again, Jim Meyering, 2011/04/30
- Re: VC-tag again, Bruno Haible, 2011/04/30
- Re: VC-tag again, Reuben Thomas, 2011/04/30
- Re: VC-tag again, Jim Meyering, 2011/04/30
- Re: VC-tag again,
Reuben Thomas <=
- Re: VC-tag again, Reuben Thomas, 2011/04/30