[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert |
Date: |
Sun, 29 May 2011 15:08:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Hi Paul,
> > "verify.h" no longer defines the 'verify' macro if
> > <assert.h> was already included in the same compilation unit.
>
> Thanks, I pushed this fix:
This is better: The error is gone. But there are warnings now:
$ ./gnulib-tool --test assert-h exclude
...
In file included from ../../gllib/exclude.c:41:
../../gllib/verify.h:223:1: warning: "verify_true" redefined
In file included from ../../gllib/mbuiter.h:92,
from ../../gllib/exclude.c:38:
./assert.h:252:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
In file included from ../../gllib/exclude.c:41:
../../gllib/verify.h:228:1: warning: "verify" redefined
In file included from ../../gllib/mbuiter.h:92,
from ../../gllib/exclude.c:38:
./assert.h:257:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
...
Bruno
--
In memoriam John Penry <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Penry>
- proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/05
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Bruno Haible, 2011/05/05
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/05
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Bruno Haible, 2011/05/05
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/05
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/06
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Bruno Haible, 2011/05/22
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/22
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Paul Eggert, 2011/05/29
- Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Bruno Haible, 2011/05/29
Re: proposed support for C1X-style static_assert, Andy Moreton, 2011/05/06