[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:40:59 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Jim Meyering wrote:
> it complains about the following:
>
> m4/printf-posix-rpl.m4: AC_LIBOBJ([printf])
> Do not use AC_LIBOBJ in m4/*.m4;
This one was a typo in my mail. Fixed:
2011-06-16 Bruno Haible <address@hidden>
syntax-check: Fix typo.
* Makefile (allow_AC_LIBOBJ): Mention printf-posix-rpl.m4, not
printf-posix.m4.
Reported by Jim Meyering.
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ allow_AC_LIBOBJ = \
fcntl \
fprintf-posix \
open \
- printf-posix \
+ printf-posix-rpl \
snprintf \
sprintf-posix \
stdio_h \
--
In memoriam Imre Nagy <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imre_Nagy>
- [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions, Bruno Haible, 2011/06/06
- Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions, Bruno Haible, 2011/06/15
- Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions, Tom G. Christensen, 2011/06/16
- Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions, Bruno Haible, 2011/06/16
- Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions, Tom G. Christensen, 2011/06/18
- Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions, Bruno Haible, 2011/06/18