[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] warnings: add comments about previous patch
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] warnings: add comments about previous patch |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:31:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) |
Hi Eric, and thanks for the quick patch.
On Wednesday 27 July 2011, Eric Blake wrote:
> Make sure we don't unintentionally revert this intentional break
> in the typical autoconf style because a future change was only
> tested with newer autoconf.
>
> * m4/absolute-header.m4: Document AS_VAR_PUSHDEF limitation.
> * m4/include_next.m4: Likewise.
> * m4/warn-on-use.m4: Likewise.
> * m4/warnings.m4: Likewise, and simplify use.
> Suggested by Stefano Lattarini.
>
If you haven't already pushed this, I'd like to suggest to credit Jim too
here: it was him who've had the idea of marking the comments as "FIXME",
and to suggest the removal of the hacks once a more modern autoconf can be
assumed.
I hope I'm not being overly nitpicking BTW; if I am, please execuse me,
and just ignore this mail.
Thanks,
Stefano
- Re: [libvirt] gnulib compiler warning detection broken on RHEL5 autoconf, Eric Blake, 2011/07/26
- [PATCH] include-next, warnings: support older autoconf, Eric Blake, 2011/07/26
- Re: [PATCH] include-next, warnings: support older autoconf, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/07/26
- Re: [PATCH] include-next, warnings: support older autoconf, Jim Meyering, 2011/07/26
- Re: [PATCH] include-next, warnings: support older autoconf, Eric Blake, 2011/07/26
- [PATCH] warnings: add comments about previous patch, Eric Blake, 2011/07/26
- Re: [PATCH] warnings: add comments about previous patch,
Stefano Lattarini <=
- Re: [PATCH] warnings: add comments about previous patch, Jim Meyering, 2011/07/27