[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: getting EBADF on MSVC
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: getting EBADF on MSVC |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Sep 2011 11:30:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-0.5-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> >> * Why does dup2.c need to use 'inline'?...
> >
> > Do you know the optimizing behaviour of MSVC, or are you making assumptions?
>
> It's the other way around, no? If we don't know the optimizing
> behavior then we should omit "inline".
I disagree. It's good and normal programming style to add 'inline' in front of
all static functions that are only used once in the compilation unit.
Bruno
--
In memoriam Safia Ahmed-jan <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safia_Ahmed-jan>
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, (continued)
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/23
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/23
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/19
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/19
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/20
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/24
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/24
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/25
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/24
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/25
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/25
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/19
- Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/19
Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/18
Re: getting EBADF on MSVC, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/23