Re: Relocation patch for cygwin

[Charles Wilson]

On 9/26/2011 6:00 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> It is normal that --enable-relocatable has a runtime cost. Certainly when
> you apply --enable-relocatable to small, fast programs like 'id' or 'pwd'
> the runtime cost will be more perceivable than with programs which run
> for longer than 1 second on average, such as 'emacs' or 'm4'.

Any comment on this...

On 9/26/2011 1:30 AM, jojolino wrote:
> there is '-DENABLE_RELOCATABLE=1' in
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gettext.git/tree/gettext-runtime/intl/Makefile.in
> which cannot be affected by `--enable-relocation`.

Shouldn't the value of ENABLE_RELOCATABLE depend on whether
--enable-relocatable was used?

Arranging that to happen will be tricky, since @RELOCATABLE@ is either
"yes" or "no" and not '#' or ''.  Might need another AC_SUBST value
similar to
RELOCATABLE_VIA_LD_FALSE
RELOCATABLE_VIA_LD_TRUE

--
Chuck