Re: gengetopt, anyone?

[Rhys Ulerich]

On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> wrote:
> I notice no-one mentioned argp. (I also notice one of autoopts's
> testimonials says that it (autoopts) is simpler than argp!). But from
> a quick look argp seems rather neat; it doesn't need a separate parser
> and code generator, and it's available in gnulib.

I very much like argp and have used it in several projects.  I find
the amount control possible for --help formatting to be refreshing
compared to many other option processing libraries.  I also like
(though have not used) it's ability to provide reusable options
processing building blocks.

- Rhys