Re: RRI - copyright assignment mailed in

[Paolo Bonzini]

Il 27/04/2012 10:47, Aharon Robbins ha scritto:
> What I sent to the list a while back should do. If not, I will recreate
> the patches but I can't promise they'll 100% follow Jim's standards.

Yes, please recreate them.

>> I will once more write down my requirements for the patches to go in:
>>
>> 1) For regex, the patches should only touch !_LIBC sections of the code,
>> so that they can be included in glibc too from the beginning;
> 
> I believe this is the case already.

Cool!

>> 2) Later we can discuss affecting also the _LIBC sections of the code,
>> including fnmatch.  Until then, the patches should not affect the
>> autoconf test for --with/without-included-regex.
> 
> How do I check this?

Easy, you do not touch *.m4 at all. :)

Of course the behavior for --with and --without-included-regex will be
different.  However, I don't want the *default* choice made by autoconf
to change; not yet, at least.

> As a separate question, there are some bugs in glibc regex that I
> have fixed and would like to submit patches for. Can I send them to
> you offline?

Sure.

Paolo