Re: musl compatibility

[Reuben Thomas]

On 8 June 2012 11:19, Pedro Alves <address@hidden> wrote:
> I've heard such rants as well.  The rants are IMO, misdirected.  For instance,
> IIRC, gnulib's freadahead use is caused by musl's printf not being posix
> compliant, causing gnulib to pull in its printf replacement, which doesn't 
> work
> on musl.  A library that is new, actively maintained, and that calls itself
> a "C/POSIX standard library" should really address that by making it's printf
> posix compliant, so that gnulib's fallback doesn't even get built.  It seems 
> that
> nobody who is interested in musl has looked at gnulib's config.log to 
> understand
> why does gnulib think musl's printf is not good enough.

Thanks; I'll report that to the musl development list.

-- 
http://rrt.sc3d.org