Re: Why require SLOW_BUT_NO_HACKS for stubs?

[Paul Eggert]

On 06/09/2012 11:05 PM, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> Is there any reason not to merge

Performance, surely.  But if there's
consensus that performance does not matter that
much with musl, perhaps we should default to the
slow version with musl.

Is there any simple way to tell at compile-time,
or at configure-time, that musl is being used?
That would help us distinguish musl (where being
slow is acceptable) from other platforms (which may not
want that).