[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [musl] Re: musl bugs found through gnulib
From: |
Rich Felker |
Subject: |
Re: [musl] Re: musl bugs found through gnulib |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:11:56 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Some updates...
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:49:44AM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> There is a recipe, in <http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Testing/Gnulib>,
> that explains how to use gnulib to check a libc against bugs. When I apply
> this to musl-0.9.1, I get this list of problems:
>
> Replacements of *printf, because of
> [...]
> checking whether printf survives out-of-memory conditions... no
No idea. Copying out the test and running it directly, it passes just
fine for me. Maybe gnulib has already replaced printf with its own
malloc-using version by the time it gets to this test??
> Replacement of fdopen, because of
> checking whether fdopen sets errno... no
There was one bug here (failure to set errno when mode string was
invalid) but I don't think that's the case gnulib was testing for. It
seems gnulib wants an error for the "may fail" when the fd is invalid.
> Replacement of futimens, because of
> checking whether futimens works... no
gnulib always forces this test to fail if __linux__ is defined.
Rich
- Re: Why require SLOW_BUT_NO_HACKS for stubs?, (continued)
- Re: Why require SLOW_BUT_NO_HACKS for stubs?, John Spencer, 2012/06/12
- Re: Why require SLOW_BUT_NO_HACKS for stubs?, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: Why require SLOW_BUT_NO_HACKS for stubs?, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/06/23
- Re: Why require SLOW_BUT_NO_HACKS for stubs?, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/24
- Re: Why require SLOW_BUT_NO_HACKS for stubs?, John Spencer, 2012/06/24
- Re: Why require SLOW_BUT_NO_HACKS for stubs?, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/25
- Re: Why require SLOW_BUT_NO_HACKS for stubs?, John Spencer, 2012/06/25
- Re: Why require SLOW_BUT_NO_HACKS for stubs?, Philipp Thomas, 2012/06/25
- Re: musl bugs found through gnulib, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: [musl] Re: musl bugs found through gnulib, idunham, 2012/06/17
- Re: [musl] Re: musl bugs found through gnulib,
Rich Felker <=
- Re: [musl] Re: musl bugs found through gnulib, Eric Blake, 2012/06/18
- Re: [musl] Re: musl bugs found through gnulib, Rich Felker, 2012/06/18
- Re: musl, fdopen test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/19
- Re: musl, fdopen test, Jim Meyering, 2012/06/19
- Re: musl, fdopen test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/20
- Re: musl, printf out-of-memory test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/19
- Re: [musl] Re: musl, printf out-of-memory test, Rich Felker, 2012/06/19
- Re: musl, printf out-of-memory test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/19
- Re: musl, printf out-of-memory test, Rich Felker, 2012/06/19
- Re: musl, printf out-of-memory test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/19