[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: getopt.m4 test
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: getopt.m4 test |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Jun 2012 09:31:22 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 |
On 06/23/2012 09:22 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> getopt-posix: No longer guarantee that option processing is resettable.
That looks good to me, and thanks.
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, (continued)
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/19
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Ben Pfaff, 2012/06/18
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Rich Felker, 2012/06/18
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Ben Pfaff, 2012/06/18
- Re: musl printf bugs, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: musl printf bugs, Rich Felker, 2012/06/17
- Re: musl printf bugs, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: getopt.m4 test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/19
- Re: getopt.m4 test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/23
- Re: getopt.m4 test,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: getopt.m4 test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/26
Re: stdioext on musl, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: stdioext on musl, Rich Felker, 2012/06/17
- Re: stdioext on musl, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/17
- Re: stdioext on musl, Rich Felker, 2012/06/17
- Re: stdioext on musl, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/17
- Re: stdioext on musl, Rich Felker, 2012/06/17
- Re: stdioext on musl, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
Re: stdioext on musl, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
Re: stdioext on musl, Rich Felker, 2012/06/17