[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: getopt.m4 test
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: getopt.m4 test |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:54:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.7.4 (Linux/3.1.10-1.9-desktop; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> > getopt-posix: No longer guarantee that option processing is resettable.
>
> That looks good to me, and thanks.
Thanks for the review. Eric was silent. So I'm applying this change, together
with a note in the NEWS file.
Bruno
Date Modules Changes
2012-06-26 getopt-posix This module no longer guarantees that option
processing is resettable. If your code uses
'optreset' or 'optind = 0;', rewrite it to make
only one pass over the argument array.
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, (continued)
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Ben Pfaff, 2012/06/18
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Rich Felker, 2012/06/18
- Re: isnanl, printf, and non-IEEE values, Ben Pfaff, 2012/06/18
- Re: musl printf bugs, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: musl printf bugs, Rich Felker, 2012/06/17
- Re: musl printf bugs, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: getopt.m4 test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/19
- Re: getopt.m4 test, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/23
- Re: getopt.m4 test, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/23
- Re: getopt.m4 test,
Bruno Haible <=
Re: stdioext on musl, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: stdioext on musl, Rich Felker, 2012/06/17
- Re: stdioext on musl, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/17
- Re: stdioext on musl, Rich Felker, 2012/06/17
- Re: stdioext on musl, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/17
- Re: stdioext on musl, Rich Felker, 2012/06/17
- Re: stdioext on musl, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
Re: stdioext on musl, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
Re: stdioext on musl, Rich Felker, 2012/06/17
Re: stdioext on musl, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17