[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] fts: when there is no risk of overlap, use memcpy, not memmo
|
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] fts: when there is no risk of overlap, use memcpy, not memmove |
|
Date: |
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:40:36 +0200 |
On 09/04/2012 12:21 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> While investigating the rm-vs-slash-decorated-symlink-to-dir problem,
> I noticed this:
>
> From 9322cc5db3a6efe4c19f274512a28767872384e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:31:09 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] fts: when there is no risk of overlap, use memcpy, not
> memmove
>
> * lib/fts.c (fts_alloc): Fix unjustified memcopy: s/memmove/memcpy/
>
Shouldn't it read "Fix unjustified memmove"?
Regards,
Stefano