Re: hash-pjw license

[Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos]

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> It might be better to not have the tablesize
> arg, at least in a variant of the function.

This would result to 4 functions instead:
1. the original hash_pjw()
2. hash_pjw_no_tablesize()
3. hash_pjw_s()
4. hash_pjw_s_no_tablesize()

We can eliminate (2), but still there are 3 variants of the same
function. Maybe it is better to keep only (4) and (1) for backwards
compatibility, and anybody who wants to do the % tablesize to do it
after calling the hash_pjw_s_no_tablesize() function?

regards,
Nikos