[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: git-version-gen w/o git

From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: git-version-gen w/o git
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:05:13 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0

On 11/29/2012 11:12 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
This seems to be stalled because of a misconception. Can I please get
a second opinion? Please?

I'm afraid I don't understand the problem well enough to offer
an opinion -- maybe it's because I don't understand the desire
to do maintenance without git -- but I did look over the patch
and noticed that it used ">& /dev/null", which isn't portable;
it should use ">/dev/null 2>&1".

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]