[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] regex: test for buffer overrun
|
From: |
Dmitry V. Levin |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] regex: test for buffer overrun |
|
Date: |
Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:34:34 +0400 |
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:07:09PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 09:48 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > I think gnulib's tests/test-regex.c should allow glibc's re_search()
> > behavior so that various utilities built --without-included-regex
> > wouldn't be penalized by test-regex:
>
> This looks like a good idea, thanks; but shouldn't gnulib/m4/regex.m4
> have a similar change?
Indeed. Since m4/regex.m4 contains a copy of tests/test-regex.c,
it should have this change too.
> Even with the change, utilities built --without-included-regex will
> still report errors with an unpatched glibc because the tests will
> dump core, but I assume that's the intent and that's fine.
Yes.
--
ldv
pgplqFxlJymMQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] regex: test for buffer overrun, Nix, 2013/04/01
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] regex: test for buffer overrun, Carlos O'Donell, 2013/04/09
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] regex: test for buffer overrun, Dmitry V. Levin, 2013/04/11
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] regex: test for buffer overrun, Paul Eggert, 2013/04/11
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] regex: test for buffer overrun,
Dmitry V. Levin <=
- [PATCH] regex-tests, regex: allow glibc re_search behavior, Dmitry V. Levin, 2013/04/11
- Re: [PATCH] regex-tests, regex: allow glibc re_search behavior, Paul Eggert, 2013/04/11
- Re: [PATCH] regex-tests, regex: allow glibc re_search behavior, Dmitry V. Levin, 2013/04/11