[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] tests: don't assume getdtablesize () <= 10000000
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] tests: don't assume getdtablesize () <= 10000000 |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:51:26 +0200 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> +2013-04-29 Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> +
> + tests: don't assume getdtablesize () <= 10000000
> + * modules/cloexec-tests:
> + * modules/dup2-tests:
> + * modules/dup3-tests:
> + * modules/nonblocking-tests:
> + * modules/posix_spawn_file_actions_addclose-tests:
> + * modules/posix_spawn_file_actions_adddup2-tests:
> + * modules/posix_spawn_file_actions_addopen-tests:
> + * modules/unistd-safer-tests:
> + Depend on the getdtablesize module.
> + * tests/test-cloexec.c:
> + * tests/test-dup-safer.c:
> + * tests/test-dup2.c:
> + * tests/test-dup3.c:
> + * tests/test-fcntl.c:
> + * tests/test-nonblocking.c:
> + * tests/test-posix_spawn_file_actions_addclose.c:
> + * tests/test-posix_spawn_file_actions_adddup2.c:
> + * tests/test-posix_spawn_file_actions_addopen.c:
> + Don't assume getdtablesize () <= 10000000.
> +
Thanks for the change, Paul.
Does this mean that you found a system on which it is larger,
and that this is addressing some test failures?