Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add nmalloc, NMALLOC et al.

bug-gnulib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add nmalloc, NMALLOC et al.

From:	Paul Eggert
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add nmalloc, NMALLOC et al.
Date:	Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:57:41 -0800
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0

On 11/06/2013 04:27 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Is nmalloc a standard (or proposed standard)?

No, but it should be, because of the integer overflow problem.
Is that something you can get the ball rolling on?
Standardization committees are not my strong suit.

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[PATCH 1/2] Add nmalloc, NMALLOC et al., Ondřej Bílka, 2013/11/03
- [SPATCH 2/2] Rewrite malloc/malloca to one avoiding overflows., Ondřej Bílka, 2013/11/03
  - Re: [SPATCH 2/2] Rewrite malloc/malloca to one avoiding overflows., Paul Eggert, 2013/11/03
    - Re: [SPATCH 2/2] Rewrite malloc/malloca to one avoiding overflows., Ondřej Bílka, 2013/11/03
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add nmalloc, NMALLOC et al., Paul Eggert, 2013/11/03
  - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add nmalloc, NMALLOC et al., Ondřej Bílka, 2013/11/03
    - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add nmalloc, NMALLOC et al., Paul Eggert, 2013/11/03
    - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add nmalloc, NMALLOC et al., Ondřej Bílka, 2013/11/03
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add nmalloc, NMALLOC et al., Richard W.M. Jones, 2013/11/06
  - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add nmalloc, NMALLOC et al., Ondřej Bílka, 2013/11/06
  - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add nmalloc, NMALLOC et al., Paul Eggert <=
    - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add nmalloc, NMALLOC et al., Richard W.M. Jones, 2013/11/08

Prev by Date: Re: Version number tag
Next by Date: tight-scope check confusion
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add nmalloc, NMALLOC et al.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add nmalloc, NMALLOC et al.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread