bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sed: minor glitch that prevents building it in GCC 2.96


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: sed: minor glitch that prevents building it in GCC 2.96
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 23:29:27 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

Il 18/07/2014 19:52, Oliver Schneider ha scritto:
> Hi,
> 
> I happened to be working on an ancient Redhat system with GCC 2.96 and
> got the following error:
> 
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..  -I../lib -I.. -I../lib   -g -O2 -MT
> regex.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/regex.Tpo -c -o regex.o regex.c
> In file included from regex.c:71:
> regcomp.c: In function `init_word_char':
> regcomp.c:958: parse error before `int'
> regcomp.c:971: `i' undeclared (first use in this function)
> regcomp.c:971: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> regcomp.c:971: for each function it appears in.)
> regcomp.c:983: `ch' undeclared (first use in this function)
> regcomp.c:994: `j' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 
> The problem turns out to be the fact that a statement comes before the
> variable declarations on line 957.
> 
> -----------------------
> $ diff -u lib/regcomp.c lib/regcomp.c-patched |tee regcomp.c.patch
> --- lib/regcomp.c       2012-12-22 13:21:52.000000000 +0000
> +++ lib/regcomp.c-patched       2014-07-18 17:42:24.000000000 +0000
> @@ -954,10 +954,10 @@
>  internal_function
>  init_word_char (re_dfa_t *dfa)
>  {
> -  dfa->word_ops_used = 1;
>    int i = 0;
>    int j;
>    int ch = 0;
> +  dfa->word_ops_used = 1;
>    if (BE (dfa->map_notascii == 0, 1))
>      {
>        bitset_word_t bits0 = 0x00000000;
> -----------------------
> 
> Affected version: sed-4.2.2
> 
> This was the only issue I ran into, so I guess it should be fixed since
> there is no apparent good reason to break backwards compatibility
> because of a single line.

Thanks for the report, I'm forwarding to bug-gnulib since the
lib/regcomp.c file comes from gnulib.

Paolo

> With best regards,
> 
> // Oliver
> 
> PS: patch also attached, but I'm not sure where this mail is going and
> whether it will get stripped :)
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]