Re: [PATCH 18/21] Workaround for dirfd() on OS/2 kLIBC

[KO Myung-Hun]

Hi/2.

Paul Eggert wrote:
> KO Myung-Hun wrote:
>> * lib/fts.c (fts_build): Do not check dir_fd on OS/2 kLIBC.
> 
> I'm afraid this change needs more explanation.  If the problem is that
> dirfd returns -2, the earlier part of fts_build will return when that
> happens, so that problem cannot be fixed by the patch that you sent.
> 

First of all, sorry. I've misread codes. Essential problem is that kLIBC
dup() does not work on a directory fd. So this patch tries to use a path
instead of fd.

And dirfd() always returns -2 as I said before. But dirfd() is executed
only if continue_readdir is true.

> What actually goes wrong if the change is omitted?

For examples, rm -rf fails like this.

-----
rm.exe: traversal failed: 'g:\\ex\\t': Bad file number
-----

-- 
KO Myung-Hun

Using Mozilla SeaMonkey 2.7.2
Under OS/2 Warp 4 for Korean with FixPak #15
In VirtualBox v4.1.32 on Intel Core i7-3615QM 2.30GHz with 8GB RAM

Korean OS/2 User Community : http://www.ecomstation.co.kr