[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: suggestion: minor change to maint.mk's 'coverage' targets to help de
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: suggestion: minor change to maint.mk's 'coverage' targets to help develop coverage tests faster |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Jun 2016 23:31:08 -0700 |
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Assaf Gordon <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to suggest the following minor change to the 'coverage' targets in
>> 'maint.mk'.
>>
>> With it, when improving coverage of the test suite, a developer can
>> bootstrap the coverage build with 'make coverage', then add individual test,
>> then run "make re-coverage" and just re-generate the reports, without the
>> need to rebuild and re-check the entire project.
>
> That patch looks fine. As before, please capitalize the first word of
> each sentence in the commit log.
>
> I was going to say you should add the new target name as a dependent
> of .PHONY, so that "make -t" does not create the corresponding file,
> but then saw that was not done for any of the coverage-related
> targets.
>
> It should be done for all of those targets, but not necessarily on this diff.
>
>> P.S.
>> An alternative is to move the 'lcov' command into the 'gen-coverage' target,
>> but I wasn't sure if 'gen-coverage' is separate for some historical reason.
>
> I don't know about the rationale.
One more thing: for this line in the commit log,
(re-coverage): new target, re-captures coverage data and generates update
I think you want a "d" at the end:
(re-coverage): New target, re-captures coverage data and generates updated
coverage HTML reports.