bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] git-version-gen: Fix for tags containing '-'


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-version-gen: Fix for tags containing '-'
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 07:47:58 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)

Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:

> Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> there's an additional problem my patch fails to address:
>>
>>      # Change the first '-' to a '.', so version-comparing tools work 
>> properly.
>>      # Remove the "g" in git describe's output string, to save a byte.
>>      v=`echo "$v" | sed 's/-/./;s/\(.*\)-g/\1-/'`;
>>
>> Messes with '-' in tags.  I think it should replace the first '-g'
>> instead.  What do you think?
>
> Sorry, I'm not following. Could you give an example of the problem?
> Evidently the code is messing with the first "-" and the last "-g"
> deliberately.

I was too terse, and not entirely accurate, sorry.  Let me try again.

If I understand this code's intent correctly, it tries to change the "-"
separating the tag from the number of additional commits to ".", and the
"-g" separating the number of additional commits from the abbreviated
object name to just "-".  Example:

    v0.1-1496-gcbc7002

becomes

    v0.1.1496-cbc7002

The problem is once again tag names containing "-", because then the
first "-" is *not* the one we want to change.

Example:

    $ git-tag -m test v0.2-rc1 HEAD^
    $ git-describe 
    v0.2-rc1-1-gcbc7002
    $ build-aux/git-version-gen .tarball-version; echo
    0.2.rc1-1-cbc700

We change the tag name instead of the "-" seperating it from the number
of commits.

After the next commit, we'll get "0.2.rc1-2-cbc700".  Will those two
version-compare correctly?

Example:

    $ git-tag -fm test v0.2-rc1
    Updated tag 'v0.2-rc1' (was 1657134)
    $ git-describe 
    v0.2-rc1
    $ build-aux/git-version-gen .tarball-version; echo
    0.2.rc1

There is no number of commits to change.  We change the tag name
instead.

Should we replace /-([^-]+)-g([^-]*)$/ by /.\1-\2/?  Extended regexp
for clarity.  Tighter matching would be possible, say
/-([0-9]+)-g[0-9a-f]{4,}$/.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]