[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Suppressing sanitizer in sha256.c

From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: Suppressing sanitizer in sha256.c
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:03:43 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0

On 04/03/2018 01:47 PM, Tim Rühsen wrote:
This is expected behavior but still it rings the 'alarm bell'.

My kneejerk reaction is that the code has well-defined behavior and I'd rather that developers didn't use -fsanitize=unsigned-integer-overflow. For Gnulib, that flag is more trouble than it's worth.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]