[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance
From: |
Matteo Croce |
Subject: |
Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance |
Date: |
Sat, 12 May 2018 14:03:12 +0200 |
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 5:56 PM, Assaf Gordon <address@hidden> wrote:
> This echoes back to Bruno's suggestion of runtime parsing of
> /proc/crypto - which adds more complexity.
>
That's very difficult, as entries will appear in /proc only after a module load
>
> For example if this change is endorsed by Redhat, and enabled by default
> just for sha*sum in the next major version release, it will provide lots
> of supporting evidence that it works well, and might be enabled globally
> by default.
>
FYI I'm doing this as an hobbyist, as I have an home server running Debian 9.
Cheers,
--
Matteo Croce
per aspera ad upstream
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, (continued)
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Assaf Gordon, 2018/05/07
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Matteo Croce, 2018/05/08
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Bruno Haible, 2018/05/08
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Matteo Croce, 2018/05/08
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Paul Eggert, 2018/05/09
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Matteo Croce, 2018/05/09
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Assaf Gordon, 2018/05/09
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance,
Matteo Croce <=