[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What to do about gnulib libio dependencies?

From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: What to do about gnulib libio dependencies?
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 10:54:49 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

Zack Weinberg wrote:

I think it would clarify this discussion if you gave concrete examples
of existing programs that use these functions, and described what they
are doing with them that can't be accomplished using the standard

No GNU utility cares about wide streams that I know of. Wide streams were a mistake as far as I can tell.

As I recall, the most important user of the gnulib libio dependencies is GNU m4, which uses freadptr and freadseek for efficiency. GNU 'cut' is in the same camp, though it's less important.

GNU coreutils uses freadahead when deciding whether to fflush stdin, although I think this is a relatively minor optimization and wouldn't be a major loss if it went away.

I'll CC: this to Bruno Haible, who has more experience in this area. Bruno, the proposal on the table is for glibc to remove the undocumented features that let Gnulib implement fbufmode, freadahead, freadptr, freadseek, and fseterr; or instead, for glibc to export these features somehow in a way that Gnulib can access in a documented way. Please see the thread starting here:


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]