bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] pthread tests: fix missing-declarations warning.


From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pthread tests: fix missing-declarations warning.
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:39:41 +0200
User-agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-154-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; )

Hi Berny,

> +2019-07-22  Bernhard Voelker  <address@hidden>
> +
> +     pthread tests: fix missing-declarations warning.
> +     Running tests on GCC-9.1.1 with -Werror stops at:
> +       test-pthread-cond.c:87:1: error: no previous declaration for \
> +         'test_pthread_cond_wait' [-Werror=missing-declarations]
> +          87 | test_pthread_cond_wait ()
> +             | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +     * tests/test-pthread-cond.c (test_pthread_cond_wait): Declare static.

Thanks. Applied, but
- without the mention of -Werror. In gnulib, we don't support the use of
  -Werror. We do try, however, to avoid warnings on a case-by-case basis.
  -Wmissing-declarations is a generally useful warning option, so your
  patch is welcome.
- with a shorter ChangeLog entry. The ChangeLog entry does not need to
  go into that much detail. Just mentioning that there was a
  missing-declarations warning is enough. The rest of the justification
  is for the mailing-list only.

Following your patch, I did the same thing in a couple of other files:


2019-07-22  Bruno Haible  <address@hidden>

        Avoid missing-declarations warning in various tests.
        * tests/test-argp.c (fail, test1, test2, test_file, test3, test4, test5,
        test6, test_optional, test7, test8, test9, test10, test11, test12,
        test13, test14, test15, test_fun): Declare static.
        * tests/test-cnd.c (test_cnd_wait): Likewise.
        * tests/test-cond.c (test_cond): Likewise.

diff --git a/tests/test-argp.c b/tests/test-argp.c
index 0713d7f..86ddbf3 100644
--- a/tests/test-argp.c
+++ b/tests/test-argp.c
@@ -279,14 +279,14 @@ struct argp test_argp = {
 int test_number;
 unsigned failure_count = 0;
 
-void
+static void
 fail (const char *msg)
 {
   fprintf (stderr, "Test %d: %s\n", test_number, msg);
   failure_count++;
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test1 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST1 (1, "--test");
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ test1 (struct argp *argp)
     fail ("option not processed");
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test2 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST1 (2, "-t");
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ test2 (struct argp *argp)
     fail ("option not processed");
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test_file (struct argp *argp, int argc, char **argv, struct test_args *args)
 {
   if (argp_parse (argp, argc, argv, 0, NULL, args))
@@ -317,35 +317,35 @@ test_file (struct argp *argp, int argc, char **argv, 
struct test_args *args)
     fail ("option processed incorrectly");
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test3 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST1 (3, "--file=FILE");
   test_file (argp, argc, argv, &test_args);
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test4 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST2 (4, "--file", "FILE");
   test_file (argp, argc, argv, &test_args);
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test5 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST1 (5, "--input=FILE");
   test_file (argp, argc, argv, &test_args);
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test6 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST2 (6, "--input", "FILE");
   test_file (argp, argc, argv, &test_args);
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test_optional (struct argp *argp, int argc, char **argv,
                struct test_args *args, const char *val, const char *a)
 {
@@ -372,49 +372,49 @@ test_optional (struct argp *argp, int argc, char **argv,
     }
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test7 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST1 (7, "-oARG");
   test_optional (argp, argc, argv, &test_args, "ARG", NULL);
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test8 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST2 (8, "-o", "ARG");
   test_optional (argp, argc, argv, &test_args, NULL, "ARG");
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test9 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST1 (9, "--optional=ARG");
   test_optional (argp, argc, argv, &test_args, "ARG", NULL);
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test10 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST2 (10, "--optional", "ARG");
   test_optional (argp, argc, argv, &test_args, NULL, "ARG");
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test11 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST1 (11, "--optiona=ARG");
   test_optional (argp, argc, argv, &test_args, "ARG", NULL);
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test12 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST3 (12, "--option", "--optional=OPT", "FILE");
   test_optional (argp, argc, argv, &test_args, "OPT", "FILE");
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test13 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST1 (1, "--cantiga");
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ test13 (struct argp *argp)
     fail ("option not processed");
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test14 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST1 (1, "--limerick");
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ test14 (struct argp *argp)
     fail ("option not processed");
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test15 (struct argp *argp)
 {
   INIT_TEST2 (1, "-r", "FILE");
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ test15 (struct argp *argp)
 
 typedef void (*test_fp) (struct argp *argp);
 
-test_fp test_fun[] = {
+static test_fp test_fun[] = {
   test1,  test2,  test3,  test4,
   test5,  test6,  test7,  test8,
   test9,  test10, test11, test12,
diff --git a/tests/test-cnd.c b/tests/test-cnd.c
index bd8d4f2..074c2c7 100644
--- a/tests/test-cnd.c
+++ b/tests/test-cnd.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ cnd_wait_routine (void *arg)
   return 0;
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test_cnd_wait ()
 {
   struct timespec remain;
diff --git a/tests/test-cond.c b/tests/test-cond.c
index e8bd472..794fb2d 100644
--- a/tests/test-cond.c
+++ b/tests/test-cond.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ cond_routine (void *arg)
   return NULL;
 }
 
-void
+static void
 test_cond ()
 {
   int remain = 2;




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]