[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: immutable string type
From: |
Tim Rühsen |
Subject: |
Re: immutable string type |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Dec 2019 14:35:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 |
Hi Bruno,
On 28.12.19 12:17, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Would you find it useful to have an immutable string type in gnulib?
The idea is good in fact had similar thoughts/needs a while ago. IMO,
the use cases are mostly in the testing area (especially fuzzing).
As a more general approach, a function that switches already allocated
memory into read-only memory would be handy. Like in
- m = malloc()
- initialize m with some data
- if in debug mode: call memmap_readonly(m) - from this point on 'm' is
read-only and a write leads to a segmentation fault.
- ...
- free(m)
Maybe it would best be integrated into glibc ?
Functions like iasprintf could then be built around existing functions
as needed, e.g. as static inline or as macro.
> In the simplest case, this would a 'const char *' where the 'const' is
> actually checked by the hardware. You allocate it through
>
> const char *str = iasprintf (...);
>
> You use it like any 'const char *'.
>
> You free it through
>
> ifree (str);
>
> not free (str). And when you attempt to write into it:
>
> ((char *) str)[0] = 'x';
>
> it crashes.
>
> The benefits I imagine:
> - no worry about security flaws through multithreaded accesses,
> - in large applications: verification that no part of the application
> is doing side effects that it shouldn't.
>
> The implementation uses mmap() to create a read-only and a read-write
> view of the same memory area. The contents of the string is filled through
> the read-write view. All other operations are done through the read-only
> view, because the address os the string is the one of the read-only view.
>
> This won't work on all platforms, e.g. HP-UX. But it will work on glibc
> systems, BSD, and Solaris, at least.
Regards, Tim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: immutable string type, Ben Pfaff, 2019/12/28
Re: immutable string type, Paul Eggert, 2019/12/28