[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pure and const function attributes
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: pure and const function attributes |
Date: |
Sun, 03 May 2020 12:56:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-177-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Hi Paul,
Looks very good.
In attribute.h:
> +/* Attributes from GCC have macro names beginning with 'ATTRIBUTE_' to
> + avoid name clashes. */
Maybe add a pointer to the GCC documentation?
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html
In dfa.c:
># if 201710L < __STDC_VERSION__
># define FALLTHROUGH [[__fallthrough__]]
This is ugly, but the ISO C committee appears to have chosen this syntax. See
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2335.pdf
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2187.pdf
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2307.pdf
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2376.pdf
In mbrtoc32.c and nstrftime.c:
I would write
#include "attribute.h"
not
#include <attribute.h>
since it's not a standardized header.
At some point, we may be able to remove lib/unused-parameter.h. But IMO
this should wait until we've gained experience with attribute.h.
Bruno