|
From: | Bruno Haible |
Subject: | Re: portability of fopen and 'e' (O_CLOEXEC) flag |
Date: | Tue, 26 May 2020 18:09:03 +0200 |
User-agent: | KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-177-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Hi Daiki, > > Thank you for this; would it make sense to use it in the modules that do > > one-shot fopen/fclose, such as read-file? Here are proposed patches for other modules. Does this look right? Note: The patch to sethostname.c is only relevant for Minix. Minix does not have multithreading now, but a future version likely will. Bruno
0001-bitset-Make-more-robust-in-multithreaded-application.patch
Description: Text Data
0002-exclude-Make-more-robust-in-multithreaded-applicatio.patch
Description: Text Data
0003-getloadavg-Make-more-robust-in-multithreaded-applica.patch
Description: Text Data
0004-getpass-Make-more-robust-in-multithreaded-applicatio.patch
Description: Text Data
0005-readutmp-Make-more-robust-in-multithreaded-applicati.patch
Description: Text Data
0006-sethostname-Make-more-robust-in-multithreaded-applic.patch
Description: Text Data
0007-mountlist-Make-more-robust-in-multithreaded-applicat.patch
Description: Text Data
0008-javacomp-Make-more-robust-in-multithreaded-applicati.patch
Description: Text Data
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |