[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [New module] Persistent Hash Array Mapped Tries (HAMTs)
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [New module] Persistent Hash Array Mapped Tries (HAMTs) |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Oct 2020 19:41:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-189-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Hi Marc,
> Is there a special Gnulib way (or Autoconf macro) for the following test:
>
> #if defined (__STDC_VERSION__) && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L &&
> !defined (__STD_NO_ATOMICS__)
>
> I am asking because there may be non-C11 compilers that nevertheless
> understand _Atomic.
And there may be C11 compilers which don't support _Atomic and nevertheless
dont't define __STD_NO_ATOMICS__.
So, indeed it would be useful to have an Autoconf macro that tests whether
_Atomic can be used.
AFAICS, neither Autoconf, nor Gnulib, nor the autoconf-archive project
have a test for this.
Bruno
- [New module] Persistent Hash Array Mapped Tries (HAMTs), Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen, 2020/10/09
- Re: [New module] Persistent Hash Array Mapped Tries (HAMTs), Bruno Haible, 2020/10/10
- Re: [New module] Persistent Hash Array Mapped Tries (HAMTs), Bruno Haible, 2020/10/10
- Re: [New module] Persistent Hash Array Mapped Tries (HAMTs), Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen, 2020/10/10
- Re: [New module] Persistent Hash Array Mapped Tries (HAMTs), Paul Eggert, 2020/10/10
- Re: [New module] Persistent Hash Array Mapped Tries (HAMTs), Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen, 2020/10/10
- Re: [New module] Persistent Hash Array Mapped Tries (HAMTs), Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen, 2020/10/10
- Re: [New module] Persistent Hash Array Mapped Tries (HAMTs), Bruno Haible, 2020/10/10
- Re: [New module] Persistent Hash Array Mapped Tries (HAMTs), Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen, 2020/10/11
- Re: [New module] Persistent Hash Array Mapped Tries (HAMTs), Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen, 2020/10/11
- Re: HAMT iterator, Bruno Haible, 2020/10/11
- Re: HAMT iterator, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen, 2020/10/11
- Re: HAMT iterator, Bruno Haible, 2020/10/11